Legal Opinion

Willing v. Bayer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1926PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

The sole question raised upon this appeal relates to the amount allowed by the trial court to the executor as necessary expenses incurred.s by him for legal services rendered in connection with the administration of his trust and the amount paid to the guardian ad litem. Because of remarks made in the course of the oral argument here to the effect that any criticism or diminution of the amount charged would reflect upon the character and professional standing of the attorneys for the executor, we shall say at the outset that the attorneys for the executor are men of high character, long and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cowie v. StrohmeyerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Forsyth v. DoolittleSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Watkins v. SedberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Dinkelspiel v. PonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  5. Larscheid v. KittellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Touchett v. E Z Paintr Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State Ex Rel. Baker v. County Court of Rock CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In Matter of Estate of TrotalliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Estate of BraaschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Crawford v. TierneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API