Legal Opinion
O'Connell v. Hartford Life And Accident Insurance Company
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 24, 2023No. 1:21-cv-10587Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ____________________________________ ) DIANE O’CONNELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 21-CV-10587-AK HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT ) INSURANCE CO., ) ) Defendant. ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD A. KELLEY, D.J. Plaintiff Diane O’Connell (“O’Connell”) has filed suit pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), to recover long- term disability benefits terminated by Defendant Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Leahy v. Raytheon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.