Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Nesheim

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 18, 1985No. 85-34PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

This motion to dismiss the appeal arises out of the same case as Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Rogers, 84-290, decided February 25,1985, where we denied a petition for a writ of prohibition. Contemporaneously with its petition for a writ of prohibition, Ford Motor Credit sought an appeal of the order of the trial court certifying the case as a class action under A.R.C.P. Rule 23. We denied prohibition because the court had jurisdiction to decide if the case ought to be maintained as a class action. The question presented in this appeal is whether the action certifying the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Drew v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  2. Ross v. Arkansas Communities, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
  3. Drew v. FIRST FEDERAL S. & L. ASS'N, ETC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Union National Bank v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
  2. Martin v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
  3. Doe v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. Arkansas State Board of Education v. Magnolia School District No. 14Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. Arkansas Department of Human Services v. LopezSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API