Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Nesheim
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Darrell Hickman, Justice.
This motion to dismiss the appeal arises out of the same case as Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Rogers, 84-290, decided February 25,1985, where we denied a petition for a writ of prohibition. Contemporaneously with its petition for a writ of prohibition, Ford Motor Credit sought an appeal of the order of the trial court certifying the case as a class action under A.R.C.P. Rule 23. We denied prohibition because the court had jurisdiction to decide if the case ought to be maintained as a class action. The question presented in this appeal is whether the action certifying the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Drew v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- Ross v. Arkansas Communities, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1975
- Drew v. FIRST FEDERAL S. & L. ASS'N, ETC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
3Cited by9 opinions
- Union National Bank v. BarnhartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
- Martin v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Doe v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Arkansas State Board of Education v. Magnolia School District No. 14Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
- Arkansas Department of Human Services v. LopezSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.