Legal Opinion

Faux v. Mickelsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 23, 1986No. 20347PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs Faux and Nacey appeal from an order of the district court dismissing their appeal and affirming the judgment of the circuit court. This cause arose from a landlord-tenant dispute. Defendant Mickel-sen brought suit in the small claims court, fifth circuit, to recover past due rent, utilities, and costs for cleaning and repair. Faux and Nacey appeared with counsel, but brought no counterclaim against Mick-elsen and executed no counter-affidavits. Judgment was entered in favor of Mickel-sen. Faux and Nacey did not appeal within the five days provided by statute.

Several weeks later,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Brickyard Homeowners' Ass'n Management Committee v. Gibbons Realty Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Tuttle v. Hi-Land Dairyman's AssociationUtah Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Hume v. Small Claims Court of Murray CityUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Liedtke v. SchettlerUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Larson Ford Sales, Inc. v. SilverUtah Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Bichler v. DEI Systems, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Allen v. MoyerUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Kawamoto v. FrattoUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  4. SMP, INC. v. KirkmanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1992
  5. Carvana v. MFG Financial, Inc.District Court, D. Utah · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API