Legal Opinion

May v. Duncan

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided February 25, 1914PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Hobson — t

Affirming.

*587On July 27, 1912, a petition was filed in the Muhlenberg County Court signed by the requisite number of legal voters in each of the twenty-one voting precincts of the county ashing that an election be held on the question whether the sale of spirituous, vinous and malt liquors should be allowed in the county. The petition was marked by the county clerk filed, but no order was in fact entered on the order book on that day, although the clerk was directed by the judge to enter an order. The petition was filed between three and five…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bennett v. TiernayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  2. Garrard County Court v. McKeeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
  3. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Boyd County v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1893
  5. Monarch v. BreyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fox v. LantripCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  2. Hoffman v. ShueyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. McAuliffe v. HelmCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Union Gas & Oil Co. v. Indian-Tex Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. Goodwin v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API