Garrard County Court v. McKee
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 5 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL PROM MERCER CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Revised Statutes, 1 Stanton, pp. 187, 329, 467. Myers’s Supplement, 207, 208, 260. Civil Code, sections 15, 16, 120, 526, 733. MS. Opinion Supreme Ct.
Read the full summary
Case 5 — PETITION ORDINARY APPEAL PROM MERCER CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Revised Statutes, 1 Stanton, pp. 187, 329, 467. Myers’s Supplement, 207, 208, 260. Civil Code, sections 15, 16, 120, 526, 733. MS. Opinion Supreme Ct. Kansas, Oct. 31, 1871, McNiel, &c. v. Hart, &c. ■ MS. Opinion, Jan., 1858, Fulton v. Pendleton Co. Ct. 1Acts 1871, page 9. 1 Bibb, 575, Dye v. Knox. 2 Mar. 606, Talbot v. David. 1J. J. M. 108, Commonwealth v. Chambers. 1 Met. 65, Raymond v. Smith. 2 Met. 56, Maddox, &c. v. Graham & Knox. 3 Bush, 164, Arnold v. Smith. 4 Bush, 307, Fletcher v. Leight & Barret. 8 Bush, 306, Mercer…
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE LINDSAY
delivered the opinion oe the court.
The act of March 1, 1865, authorized the county courts of the several counties bordering on the Kentucky River or interested in its navigation to subscribe for stock in the Kentucky River Navigation Company. The power thus conferred and the rights and duties incident to and growing, out of such power are in their nature distinguishable from the ordinary powers and functions devolved on county courts, as representatives of the political or civil subdivisions of territory known as counties, for the purposes of said act.
The counties in question…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dye v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1809
- Judge & Justices of Hickman County Court v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867
3Cited by21 opinions
- Fox v. LantripCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Jones v. McClaughrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- Gordon, Huffaker & Garnett v. MorrowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Slayton v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1908
- State ex rel. Sloan v. WarnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.