Biovail Corp. v. Mylan Laboratories, Inc.
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AWARDING REASONABLE EXPENSES BUT NOT AWARDING SANCTIONS
SEIBERT, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
A. Background.
Biovail Corporation and Biovail Laboratories, Inc., “Biovail”, Plaintiffs, filed this ac*381tion against Mylan Industries, Inc., Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., “Mylan” and Pfizer, Inc., “Pfizer”, Defendants, February 22, 2001, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, alleging violations of the anti-trust laws. The action was transferred to this District April 24, 2001. Certain discovery disputes arose and Mylan and Pfizer filed Motions to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Romane J. Rickels v. City of South Bend, Indiana, Fara P. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Convatec Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
- Council for Tribal Employment Rights v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- PLX, Inc. v. Prosystems, Inc.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2004
- Barden v. Murphy-Brown Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022
- Barden v. Murphy-Brown Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.