Legal Opinion
PLX, Inc. v. Prosystems, Inc.
District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Decided March 29, 2004No. CIV.A. 3:03CV32PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AWARDING REASONABLE EXPENSES TO PLAINTIFF PLX, INC. AND ISSUING SANCTIONS AGAINST COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT LYONS
SEIBERT, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. Introduction
A. Background
Plaintiff, PLX, Inc. (PLX), filed this complaint on April 15, 2003 in the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia.. PLX alleges that Prosys-tems Inc. and them owners, James and Patricia Lyons (collectively referred to as Defendants) illegally infringed on two of PLX’s patents causing monetary damages to PLX. Certain discovery disputes arose and PLX filed a Motion to Compel against…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sri International v. Matsushita Electric Corporation of America and Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Chudasama v. Mazda Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kinetic Concepts, Inc. v. Convatec Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2010
- Patrick v. Teays Valley Trustees, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2013
- Saria v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2005