Hagerman v. Dayton

OPINION

By HORNBECK, P. J.

This appeal is noted as upon questions of law and fact. *143The record is made up of a stipulated statement of facts.

The action was for a declaratory judgment testing the validity, and if valid, the scope of an ordinance of the City of Dayton, No. 15776, and particularly, Sections 1 and 2 thereof.

The trial judge, among other things, found that the union dues deductions authorized to be made under the ordinance are—

‘‘For the private convenience and benefit of the city employees who are members of the union and for the benefit of the union itself, and as such the cost of…