Legal Opinion

Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. Thrasher

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 10, 1905No. 5,177PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From Carroll Circuit Court; T. F. Palmer, .Judge. Action by Woodson Thrasher against the Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Company. From a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff for $100, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

In that portion of the brief for the appellant in which it is sought to comply with the requirement of rule twenty-two of this court that the brief of appellant shall contain a short and clear statement disclosing the errors relied on for a reversal, the only supposed errors which it is sought to indicate, to which subsequent portions of the brief apply in conformity with other parts of the same rule, are the action of the court in overruling the appellant’s demurrer to the appellee’s amended complaint, and in overruling the appellant’s motion for a new trial; and to such supposed errors we,…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. O'ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Pawnee Farmers Elevator & Supply Co. v. PowellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Indianapolis & Northwestern Traction Co. v. HendersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. Indianapolis & Cincinnati Traction Co. v. SherryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. National Motor Vehicle Co. v. PakeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API