Legal Opinion

Bink v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 28, 1906No. 3611PublishedCited by 7 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

The indictment charges appellant with having stolen seven $20 bills, and four $5 bills, all alleged to be current money of the United States of America, from Chapman, in the Indian Territory, which is alleged to be in violation of the law of the Indian Territory then in force, and known as the offense of theft, and which, if committed in this State, would have been theft, and thereafter bringing said property into the County of Lamar and State of Texas.

The evidence shows that appellant and Chapman were on the train near Hugo, I. T., and engaged in conversation.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  2. State v. VickeryTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  3. White v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  4. Cline v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1875
  5. State v. MoralesTexas Supreme Court · 1858

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Segal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  3. Baldwin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  4. Lewis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Brady and Orgees v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API