Legal Opinion
Rakestraw v. Winchester
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
Decided May 16, 1966No. C-132-G-65PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EUGENE A. GORDON, District Judge.
Under the provisions of 7 U.S.C.A. § 1365 and § 1366, the plaintiffs instituted this action to obtain judicial review of the decision of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (hereinafter referred to as “ASCS”) Review Committee for Rockingham County (hereinafter referred to as the “Review Committee”). The Review Committee is established under the provisions of 7 U.S.C.A. § 1363. The plaintiffs seek a reversal of the decision of the Review Committee regarding the 1965 flue-cured tobacco marketing quota for their farm.
■The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- J. T. Fulford v. Jesse v. B. Forman, Elmer G. Gardner and Murphey W. LunaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Crolley v. TattonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
- Fred Chandler, Sr. v. W. Lewis DavidCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Kephart v. WilsonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1963
- Orville Freeman, Secretary of Agriculture of the United States of America v. Darius N. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968
- C. B. Jones, Fred W. Koch, and John H. Simpson, Marketing Quota Review Committee, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service v. Lawson Hughes, C. B. Jones, Fred W. Koch, and John H. Simpson, Marketing Quota Review Committee, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service v. Lindsey Bros., a PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1968