Legal Opinion
Jones v. Hughes
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 16, 1968No. Nos. 19095, 19096PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
The principal issue presented on this appeal is: Does a determination by personnel of a county (ASCS) office that the appellees were in compliance with their cotton acreage allotment bar a re-determination of that compliance? The District Court held that it did. Lindsey Bros. v. Jones, 271 F.Supp. 933 (E.D. Ark.1967). We hold to the contrary.
*587The secondary issue is: Are the ap-pellees nevertheless protected against the effects of an adverse redetermination by the “erroneous notice” provision of regulations promulgated by the Secretary of Agriculture pursuant to the Act? 7…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Clistie Bell Thomas v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Pearson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Benton Roberson v. Abraham A. Ribicoff, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1962
- McIlhenny v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
- Cecil E. Farley v. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Raines v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- Thomas v. County Office Committee of Cameron CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1971
- Boyd v. Secretary of AgricultureDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1978
- Strong v. GlickmanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
- Alfred W. Minish and Margaret F. Minish v. J. Lassing HueyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.