Legal Opinion

Hamed v. Pfeifer

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1995No. 64A03-9402-CV-65PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOFFMAN, Judge.

Appellants-plaintiffs Mohammed Hamed, Mohammed Isa, and Khalil Awwad appeal from a summary judgment in favor of appel-lee-defendant Daniel Pfeifer in an action for civil remedy for the disclosure or use of an allegedly illegally intercepted conversation pursuant to Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, 18 U.S.C. § 2510 et seq.

The facts relevant to this appeal disclose that Hamed and Awwad purchased an insurance policy from General Accident Insurance Company ("General Accident") which insurance covered their grocery store. The store was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Briscoe v. LaHueSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Briggs v. Clinton County Bank & Trust Co. of FrankfortIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Chambers v. American Trans Air, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Powers v. GastineauIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Boydston v. Chrysler Credit Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Loomis v. Ameritech Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. William M. Giffin v. Jack Summerlin, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  3. Steele v. McDonald's Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Wright v. Mount Auburn Daycare/PreschoolIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Hartman v. KeriIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API