Pepe v. Rodena Realty Co.
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, First District. Action by Michael E. Pepe and another against the Rodena Realty Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs for $116 damages besides-costs, entered after trial by the court, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.
This action was brought to recover 2% per cent, commissions alleged to have been earned by real estate brokers on renewals-of leases of defendant’s property of which they were in charge as general agents. The defense was a denial and payment.
Plaintiff Vincent C. Pepe testified that his firm of real estate brokers-were in charge of defendant’s property, as general agents, at a commission of 2% per cent, on the rents collected; that they ordered repairs, subject to its president’s approval, collected and remitted rents, and “looked after the tenants and about leases, and so on.” In the-fall of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Robinson v. . JewettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Carpenter v. . TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Arend v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
3Cited by1 opinion
- National Union Bank of Monticello v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1931