Legal Opinion

H. C. M. v. E. W. M.

Delaware Family Court

Decided March 10, 1980Published

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES and POPPITI, Judges.

Separate divorce actions before two judges of this Court require a determination as to whether the respective petitioners are entitled to an order of voluntary dismissal without prejudice over the objection of the respondents.

Petitioner husband H.C.M. filed a divorce action in December 1978 on the grounds of voluntary separation and incompatibility, subsequently indicating that he did not plan to pursue the voluntary separation ground. Petitioner husband B.E.M. filed a petition for divorce on March 22, 1979, on the ground of incompatibility.

Both respondents, E.W.M.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ryan v. RyanSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. Lunn v. United Aircraft Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1960
  3. Vinyard v. VinyardSuperior Court of Delaware · 1946
  4. Landsman v. LandsmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  5. Knopf v. KnopfSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API