Legal Opinion
Landsman v. Landsman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 8, 1951PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
Defendant wife, appellant herein, is aggrieved by an order granting to her husband leave to discontinue his action against her for annulment. His right to maintain this action has just been upheld by the Court of Appeals (Landsman v. Landsman, 302 N. Y. 45).
The chief reason on account of which appellant opposes a discontinuance is that she seeks a judgment in this action awarding to her permanent support under section 1140-a of the Civil Practice Act, originally enacted by chapter 226 of the Laws of 1940. The reason on account of which he evidently wishes to discontinue his lawsuit is to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Landsman v. LandsmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Matter of LasakNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Wilder v. BoyntonNew York Supreme Court · 1872
- White v. GlennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
3Cited by11 opinions
- Forbush v. ForbushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Schneider v. SchneiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Weisinger v. BerfondNew York Supreme Court · 1960
- Virgil v. VirgilNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- H. C. M. v. E. W. M.Delaware Family Court · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.