Legal Opinion
Table Services, Ltd. v. Hickenlooper
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 28, 2011No. 09CA2729PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RICHMAN.
In this case, we are called upon to determine the constitutionality of Amendment 42, enacted by Colorado voters in November 2006, for the purpose of raising the minimum hourly wage in Colorado from $5.15 to $6.85, and requiring thereafter an annual adjustment to the minimum wage based on inflation. Plaintiffs, Table Services, LTD, and seven other businesses, appeal the district court's judgment dismissing their challenge to the constitutionality of Amendment 42. We affirm.
I. Background
The material facts are not in dispute. Plaintiffs are owners and operators of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mission Springs Water District v. VerjilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Colo. Common Cause v. GesslerColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
- Colorado Education Association v. Colorado State Board of EducationColorado Court of Appeals · 2025
- Disability Examination v. ICAOColorado Court of Appeals · 2024
- Disability Examination v. ICAOColorado Court of Appeals · 2024