Legal Opinion

Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Huse & Carleton, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 7, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtB-r.at.ey, J.

This action was begun July 5, 1916, under St. 1911, c. 751, Part III, § 15, as amended by St. 1913, *361c. 448, § 1, by the plaintiff in the name of Christina J. Anderson, as administratrix of the estate of Carl Anderson. The declaration is in two counts respectively alleging the conscious suffering and death of the intestate, and the answer, among other defences, denies that the administratrix was ever married to the intestate and alleges that her appointment was invalid. R. L. c. 137, § 1. The plaintiff had issued a policy of insurance to Edward A. Laveau, the employer of the intestate. He died…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pigeon's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  2. Opinion of the Justices to the SenateMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  3. Turnquist v. HannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Hall v. Henry Thayer & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Connors v. Cunard Steamship Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farquhar v. New England Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Huse & Carleton, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  3. Broderick's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
  4. Jordan v. OrcuttMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  5. Reidy v. Old Colony Gas Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API