Broderick's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.
By agreement of the parties the only question considered in the Industrial Accident Board was “whether the employee . . .■ [had] exercised his option to proceed at law against a person other than the insured.” The . board, in substance, found and ruled that he had not, and *150that he could still pursue his remedy for compensation under the workmen’s compensation law. Thereupon certified copies of the papers were filed in the Superior Court, and the court purported to enter a decree that the employee’s claim be dismissed. He appeals.
We are constrained to hold that the Superior Court never…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Weil v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Vincent v. PleckerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Levangie's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Donnelly v. MontagueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Perkins's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Assuncao's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Harold Hobart v. Michael P. O'brien, Harold M. Hobart v. John G. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1957
- Collins v. Selectmen of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
- Epdee Corp. v. RichmondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
- Capozzi's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.