Legal Opinion

Santiago v. Rich Products Corporation

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 28, 2017No. AC 16-P-504PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShin, J.

*1169 *578 Kelvin Santiago (Kelvin) suffered traumatic brain damage after choking on meatballs served in the cafeteria of a city of Lowell (city) public school. He and his parents filed suit against the city and Rich Products, 3 the company that produced and sold the meatballs, asserting negligence and breach of the implied warranty of merchantability, among other claims. A judge allowed the city's motion for summary judgment, and, after seventeen days of trial, a jury returned a verdict in Rich Products' favor. 4 On appeal the plaintiffs claim error in the trial judge's denial of their request for an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Boazova v. Safety InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Harlow v. ChinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Gath v. M/A-Com, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  5. Keene v. Brigham & Women's Hospital, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. GILES KENNEDY v. JOEL C. ABRAMSON, trustee, & others.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
  2. Joseph M. Orlando, Jr. v. City of GloucesterMassachusetts Superior Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API