Legal Opinion

Joseph M. Orlando, Jr. v. City of Gloucester

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided August 12, 2026No. 2477CV00566Published

1Opinion of the Court

Presently before the court is Defendant's Summary Judgment Motion ("the Motion") (Paper No. 9), in which the defendant, City of Gloucester ("Gloucester"), argues the Recreational Use Statute, G.L. c. 21, § 17C (the "RUS"), bars the plaintiff, Joseph M. Orlando, Jr. ("Orlando"), from recovery under his claim of negligence against Gloucester. Orlando opposes. After hearing and review of the written submissions including pleadings, exhibits, and statements of material facts, the Motion is ALLOWED.

BACKGROUND

Orlando has brought a one-count negligence claim against Gloucester. He alleges that he…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Kourouvacilis v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Bulwer v. Mount Auburn HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
  4. O'Connor v. RedstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. Shu-Ra Ali v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API