Hulse v. Hulse
New York Supreme Court
At chambers. Motion to confirm referee’s report. Action by Benjamin Hulse and others against Samuel Hulse and another for the partition of land.
1Opinion of the CourtBradley, J.
The complaint alleged title to the premises in question in the ancestor of the parties at the time of his death, and that the plaintiffs and defendants (other than those having an alleged estate in dower present and inchoate) were his heirs, and as such tenants in common. The answer of the defendant Samuel Hulse puts in issue the allegation of such tenancy in common, and alleged title in himself by virtue of a contract of sale to him by such ancestor. The referee has found against the defendant on those issues, and, because a partition of the premises cannot be had without great prejudice to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ford v. . KnappNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Culver v. . RhodesNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Prentice v. . JanssenNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Sullivan v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Wainman v. . HamptonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- La Tourette v. DeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1892
- Spliess v. MeyerNew York Supreme Court · 1891