Legal Opinion

Grant v. Entm't Cruises, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 16, 2017No. Civil Action Nos. 17–1159 (JEB); 17–1410 (JEB)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES E. BOASBERG, United States District Judge

Tamea Grant, a deckhand on a local cruise ship who suffered injuries during a docking incident, now brings these consolidated pro se actions against the cruise line and its parent. While difficult to decipher, the Amended Complaints appear to invoke the District of Columbia's Occupational Safety and Health Act, the District's Industrial Safety Act, and the federal Jones Act. Defendants now move to dismiss, contending that the first statute provides no private right of action and that claims asserted under the latter two are insufficiently pled.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Grant v. Entm't Cruises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  2. McNeil v. BrownDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  3. McNeil v. HarveyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
  4. Omene v. Accenture Federal ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API