Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 24, 2007No. WD 66345PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Clifford Taylor appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief based on Rule 29.15 and the assertion that he received ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Because we determine that the motion court clearly erred, we reverse the denial of relief.

Background

Around 3:45 p.m. on August 23, 2001, Officer Paul Luster and Officer Michael Eickmann were on patrol in Kansas City. As the officers crested a hill, they noticed a man walking in the middle of the street. Under Kansas City ordinance 70-786, walking in the street, where a sidewalk has been provided, is a traffic violation.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. United States v. Tommie T. ChildsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Moss v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. United States of America v. $ 404,905.00 in U.S. Currency, Stephen AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howell v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API