Legal Opinion
Howell v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided January 24, 2012No. WD 71772PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. SMART, JR., Judge.
Charles Howell appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, he raises a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
In May 2003, Charles Howell was charged by a grand jury indictment in the Circuit Court of Cass County with the class A felony of robbery in the first degree and armed criminal action. The charges stemmed from Howell’s involvement in the robbery of a Pizza Hut restaurant in July 2002. In May 2004, Howell was convicted following a jury…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Smith v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- United States v. John VoigtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Joyner v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2014
- Lucinda "Cindy" Guthrie v. Missouri Department of Labor and Industrial RelationsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Deric L. Coon v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Richard E. Robertson v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2016
- Shoate v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.