Legal Opinion

Clow v. Metropolitan Sanitary District

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 22, 1983No. 82—3060PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

Ronald Clow, the plaintiff, was injured while he was working on the construction of a tunnel. He filed a multi-count complaint. Only the count stating a cause of action under the Structural Work Act is now at issue. (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1981, ch. 48, pars. 60-69.) The trial court granted a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendant, Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago (MSD). Clow appeals.

Clow was employed as a locomotive engineer for a contractor on the project. MSD was the owner of the property and was allegedly in charge of the work. The job site consisted of a 30-foot…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Louis v. BarenfangerIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Tenenbaum v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Crafton v. Lester B. Knight & Associates, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Oldham v. KubinskiAppellate Court of Illinois · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Overbeck v. Jon Construction, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Glazier v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. Glazier v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API