Legal Opinion · Dissent

Glazier v. American National Bank & Trust Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 8, 1995No. 1—93—0251Published

1DissentJustice Tully

I must respectfully dissent from the majority’s opinion. I believe this is exactly the type of incident for which the Structural Work Act provides a remedy.

It is the desire to prevent injuries to workers engaged in structural work and place the full responsibility for the prevention of such injuries on contractors and their clients that animates the Structural Work Act (Act) (740 ILCS 150/1 et seq. (West 1992)). (Pozzi v. McGee Associates, Inc. (1992), 236 Ill. App. 3d 390, 602 N.E.2d 1302.) The majority’s narrow view of the Act’s reach runs contrary to the spirit and intent of the law as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tenenbaum v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Pozzi v. McGee Associates, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Overbeck v. Jon Construction, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  4. Clow v. Metropolitan Sanitary DistrictAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  5. Ponziano v. K.R. Kleiner & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API