Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Stevens

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 22, 1918No. 8515PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark. Judge. Action by V. H. Stevens against James S. 'Gladish, R. H. Thompson, Mattie M. Thompson, and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and the named defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RUMMONS, C.

The only assignment of error argued in the brief of plaintiffs in error is that the decision and judgment are not sustained by the evidence and are contrary to law and to the evidence. A proper consideration of this assignment of error requires a review of the evidence and the proceedings at the trial.

• Plaintiffs in error appeal by transcript, in which is incorporated a purported bill of exceptions. The motion for new trial was overruled on February 4, 1916. Plaintiffs in error prayed an extension of 60- days from the date in which to make and serve a case-made, which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lampton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Liquid Carbonic Co. v. RodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Roddy v. Lambard-Hart Loan Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  2. Mitchell v. Lambard-Hart Realty & Inv. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. L. D. Powell Co. v. CasteelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API