Legal Opinion

Liquid Carbonic Co. v. Rodman

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 3, 1915No. 4532PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Seminole County; Tom D. McKeown, Judge. Action by the Liquid Carbonic Company against Charles M. Rodman. From the judgment, the plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

The petition in error in this case assigns errors of law occurring at the trial, and the case is brought here on a transcript of the record, which includes a bill of exceptions, purporting to embrace •everything that occurred at the trial, including all the evidence, etc. On May 10, 1912, the motion for new trial was heard and overruled by the court, and plaintiff in error here (plaintiff below) was- allowed 90 days within which to make and serve a case-made. No steps were taken thereafter to do so; but on October 16, 1912, all of the proceedings at the trial were reduced…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lampton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Adams Royalty Co. v. FaulknerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Godfrey v. F. D. Bearley Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Thompson v. StevensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Leftwich v. MarksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API