Legal Opinion
Neimark v. Martin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 24, 1959PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Action by an attorney, pursuant to section 475 of the Judiciary Law, against Malfa M. Martin, his former client, and Chester E. Pilner, her former husband (1st cause of action), and James and Charlene Azaretti, the owners of real property by mesne conveyance from Chester E. Pilner, and Peekskill Savings Bank, the holder of a mortgage on said property (2d cause of action). After trial before the Official Referee to whom the action was referred to hear and determine on the consent of the parties, a judgment was entered for $1,250 in favor of the attorney on the first cause of action and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Turner v. . WoolworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Morgan v. DrewryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
- In re FalkNew York Supreme Court · 1927
- Kodenski v. Baruch Oil Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- In re LourieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
3Cited by13 opinions
- Cohen v. Grainger, Tesoriero & BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- In Matter of Petition of Rosenman & Colin, Appellee-Cross-Appellant, for an Adjudication of Its Rights in the Matter of Sherrier v. Richard. Rosenman & Colin, Cross-Appellant, Julian Sherrier v. Bernice Richard, Defendant-Respondent-Appellant, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Carpenter v. WeichertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Galvez v. Aspen Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Edwards v. Andrews, Davis, Legg, Bixler, Milsten & Murrah, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.