King v. Western United Assurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.
— When full value is given in a transaction in exchange for a promissory note, a party is not entitled to relief under the usury laws when the stated interest rate of the contract is not usurious — notwithstanding the fact that the note was subsequently resold at a discount or that the party might have been able to obtain a better deal by offering cash in the transaction rather than an installment note. We affirm summary judgment dismissing a usury claim. We also reverse the trial court’s refusal to award attorney fees to the respondent.
I
Teresa King was interested in purchasing a home, and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BerlinWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Schmitt v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Castronuevo v. General Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1995
- Maynard v. EnglandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
3Cited by11 opinions
- International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 46 v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. ZimmermanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Little v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Little v. KingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- State v. StalkerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.