Legal Opinion
State v. Stalker
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided October 19, 2009No. 62549-7-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
219 P.3d 722 (2009)
STATE of Washington, Appellant,
v.
Roger D. STALKER, Respondent.
No. 62549-7-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
October 19, 2009.
James Michael Mucklestone, Attorney at Law, Arlington, WA, for Appellant.
Charles Franklin Blackman, Snohomish County Pros., Everett, WA, for Respondent.
DWYER, A.C.J.
¶ 1 The compromise of misdemeanor statute, chapter 10.22 RCW, authorizes the trial court to dismiss a misdemeanor charge if the person injured by the acts constituting the offense has a civil remedy and appears in court acknowledging full satisfaction for the injury. RCW…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hangman Ridge Training Stables, Inc. v. Safeco Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BerlinWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Smith v. Stillwell-SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- In Re Stranger CreekWashington Supreme Court · 1970
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BarberWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BarryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- In re Pers. Restraint of ArnoldWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. BarberWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.