Hollingsworth v. Detroit
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan
In equity.
1Opinion of the Court
This ease was submitted to the court on the following facts: Hollingsworth is the holder of a considerable amount of the bonds of the city of Detroit, payable.at a distant period, with interest, payable semi-annually, on the 1st of May, and the 1st of November. Coupons, as they are called, are attached to these bonds, each of them for the interest, as it falls due, being a coupon to each bond for each semi-annual instalment of interest. These coupons are in the following terms, varying only as to the period when they fall due: “The city of Detroit acknowledges that there will be due Eobert…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State of Connecticut v.JacksonNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Mowry v. BishopNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
- Kellogg v. HickokNew York Supreme Court · 1828
- Van Benschooten v. LawsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
- Cooley v. RoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
3Cited by14 opinions
- Aurora City v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- County Commissioners v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
- United States Mortgage Co. v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Harper v. ElyIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
- Mills v. Town of JeffersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.