Legal Opinion

Hollingsworth v. Detroit

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

Decided October 15, 1844PublishedCited by 14 opinions

In equity.

1Opinion of the Court

This ease was submitted to the court on the following facts: Hollingsworth is the holder of a considerable amount of the bonds of the city of Detroit, payable.at a distant period, with interest, payable semi-annually, on the 1st of May, and the 1st of November. Coupons, as they are called, are attached to these bonds, each of them for the interest, as it falls due, being a coupon to each bond for each semi-annual instalment of interest. These coupons are in the following terms, varying only as to the period when they fall due: “The city of Detroit acknowledges that there will be due Eobert…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State of Connecticut v.JacksonNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  2. Mowry v. BishopNew York Court of Chancery · 1835
  3. Kellogg v. HickokNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  4. Van Benschooten v. LawsonNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  5. Cooley v. RoseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Aurora City v. WestSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. County Commissioners v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1869
  3. United States Mortgage Co. v. SperrySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Harper v. ElyIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Mills v. Town of JeffersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API