Legal Opinion

Cookson v. State

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 26, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAPLEY, Justice.

On appeal. The appellant instituted habeas corpus proceedings under the post-conviction statute, 14 M.R.S.A. Secs. 5502-5508. The State seasonably moved to dismiss the amended petition asserting that it failed to allege facts warranting relief. By agreement a copy of the indictment and a copy of the transcript of statements and testimony at the arraignment of the petitioner and hearing on the issue of aggravated assault were made a part of petition. The Justice below entered a judgment of dismissal. The petitioner at all times was represented by court-appointed counsel.

Petition…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
  2. Hamner v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
  3. State v. HarveySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Hodge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Morgan v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. Cunningham v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  5. Dow v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API