Granados v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Johnson, Chief Judge.
A jury found Miguel Granados guilty of sale of cocaine and trafficking in cocaine. Granados appeals from the convictions entered on the verdict, alleging (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for trafficking in cocaine, (2) the trial court erred in its charges to the jury, (3) the trial court erred in admitting his custodial statement, and (4) the trial court erred in allowing the investigator who obtained his statement to translate the statement at trial. Because each of these contentions is without merit, the convictions are affirmed.
1. Viewed in a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cupp v. NaughtenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Noggle v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- Gober v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
- Frost v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Martinez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Rainly v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
- Mills v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Blackwood v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.