Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 18, 1977No. 956, September Term, 1976PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoylan, J.

In yet another of the legion of subsidiary issues spinning off from Mullaney v. Wilbur, 421 U. S. 684, 95 S. Ct. 1881, 44 L.Ed.2d 508 (1975), and Evans v. State, 28 Md. App. 640, 349 A. 2d 300 (1975), affirmed State v. Evans, 278 Md. 197, 362 A. 2d 629 (1976), we are in this appeal required to come to grips with the problem of how the State proves a negative element and with the inevitably attendant issue of the legal sufficiency of the evidence in that regard. In effect, we are asking, “How big a legal prize does a defendant win when he succeeds in ‘bursting the bubble’ of a Thayer-Wigmore…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  4. State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  2. Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Commonwealth v. NiziolekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. ThomasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API