Legal Opinion
Anselmo v. County of Shasta
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 8, 2012No. CIV. 2:12-361 WBS EFBPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTION TO DISMISS
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Reverge Anselmo and Seven Hills Land and Cattle Company, LLC (“Seven Hills”) have brought this action against the County of Shasta, California (“Shasta County”) and Russ Mull alleging claims under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (“RLUIPA”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of plaintiffs’ First and Fourteenth Amendment rights arising out of Anselmo’s desire to construct a private chapel on land located in Shasta County. Defendant Mull has brought a motion to dismiss the Complaint in…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
- United States v. County of CulpeperDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2017
- Benjamin Robert Gallegos v. B. EbertDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Pasaye v. State of Nevada, ex relDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2020
- Schworck, Jesse v. Madison Police DepartmentDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2021
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.