Legal Opinion
State v. Kane
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided October 25, 1982No. 8384PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
BURNS, C.J.
Defendant Errol K. Kane was charged with carrying a firearm on his person without a permit or license in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 134-9 (Supp. 1980). The trial court granted Kane’s motion to dismiss the indictment because the indictment did not explicitly allege the required state of mind as specified in HRS § 702-204 (1976). The State appeals the dismissal contending that the indictment is legally sufficient. We agree.
On March 20,1981, while conducting a pat-down search, a police officer found a pistol on Kane. Kane had obtained a permit…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hurtado v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. WellsHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. IsraelHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. NesmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. Stan's Contracting, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. DalyHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.