Legal Opinion
Alhambra Motor Parts v. Federal Trade Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 9, 1962No. 17222_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
This matter is before us on a petition to review a cease and desist order issued by the Federal Trade Commission. The petitioners, who were the respondents in the agency proceeding, are Southern California Jobbers, Inc., (SCJ), a cooperative corporation, and its fifty-nine jobber-members.
The Commission order 'required them to cease and desist the practice of inducing and receiving price discriminations in violation of section 2(f) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act (Act), 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(f).
SCJ, organized under the laws of California and having…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Automatic Canteen Co. of America v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- E. Edelmann & Company v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- Southgate Brokerage Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1945
- American Motor Specialties Co., Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- White Industries, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1987
- Alterman Foods, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Flotill Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Pierce v. Commercial WarehouseDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
- Flotill Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966