Legal Opinion

Morse v. Espeland

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1985No. 84-207PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Morrison

Respondent attorney brought an action in the District Court to recover attorney fees from appellant client. Client answered and coun terclaimed, alleging breach of fiduciary duty, constructive fraud, actual fraud, deceit and legal malpractice. Attorney moved for summary judgment on client’s counterclaim. The District Court granted the motion on the grounds that no cause of action upon which relief could be granted was stated. Client now appeals. We reverse the decision of the District Court and remand for trial.

The sole issue is whether the District Court erred in granting attorney’s motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dare v. Montana Petroleum Marketing Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Gates v. Life of Montana InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Van Ettinger v. PappinMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Ryckman v. Wildwood, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. R.H. Schwartz Construction Specialties, Inc. v. HanrahanMontana Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Story v. City of BozemanMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Nicholson v. United Pacific InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Simonson v. WhiteMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Simmons v. JenkinsMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Brilz v. Metropolitan General InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API