Legal Opinion
Blanchard v. J. L. Pinkerton, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 13, 1948No. 7734PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The above-entitled cause heretofore tried, argued, and submitted, is now decided as follows:
(A) As to the complaint, judgment will be for the defendants that plaintiff take nothing by his Complaint against the defendants or either of them.
(B) As to the counterclaim, judgment and declaration will be entered as follows: (1) That the patent covered by U.S. Letters Patent No. 2199611, issued on May 7, 1940, and patent covered by U.S. Letters Patent No. 2233395, issued on May 4, 1941, are, and each of them is valid; and (2) that none of the claims are, or were, infringed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Marconi Wireless Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Electric Storage Battery Co. v. ShimadzuSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Williams Manufacturing Co. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Tucker Aluminum Products, Inc. v. GrossmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Wooster Brush Co. v. Newell Operating Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1999
- Blanchard v. J. L. Pinkerton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Tucker Aluminum Products, Inc., a Corporation v. Abraham Grossman and Glide Windows, Inc., a Corporation, Abraham Grossman and Glide Windows, Inc., a Corporation v. Tucker Aluminum Products, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963