Legal Opinion
Golda v. Hutchinson Enterprises
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to third-party plaintiff in accordance with the following Memorandum: In this Labor Law case, plaintiffs were granted partial summary judgment on their Labor Law § 240 (1) cause of action against defendant and third-party plaintiff, Hutchinson Enterprises, doing business as Kwik Stop Food Mart (Hutchinson) (see, Golda v Hutchinson Enters., 219 AD2d 803). Hutchinson has since settled with plaintiffs and now appeals from that part of an order that denied its motion for summary judgment on its third-party complaint seeking…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morales v. WalterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Majewski v. Broadalbin-Perth Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Paterson v. HennessyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Massella v. Partner Industrial Products, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Matie v. Sealed Air Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Curley v. Gateway Communications, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Kline v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1998
- Carpenter v. 149 Edison Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Frank v. Meadowlakes Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Colyer v. K Mart Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000