Dennis v. McCasland
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice
(after stating the case as above).
It is believed it may not properly be held that the facts and special circumstances show, as a matter of pure law, insufficient reason for overruling the bill of review and refusing to grant a new trial in the cause. Under express provision of the statute, applications for new trial in general must be made during the term of the court at which the judgment or decision was rendered. Article 2092, as amended by Acts 1930 (5th Called Sess.) c. 70, ,§ 1 (Vernon’s Ann. Civ. St. art. 2092), and article 2232, R. S. The exception, as provided by article 2236, is in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dunlap v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Wiseman v. CottinghamTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Hunsinger v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1930
- Wolf v. SahmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
- Strickland v. BaughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dennis v. McCaslandTexas Supreme Court · 1936
- Dennis v. McCaslandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1936