Legal Opinion

Dennis v. McCasland

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1936No. 2017—6752Published

1Opinion of the Court

GERMAN, Commissioner.

This cause was instituted by plaintiff in error, Mattie A. Dennis, joined by her husband, and was in the nature of a motion for new trial under article 2236 of the Revised Statutes of 1925. The purpose was to set aside a judgment entered against H. M. Ralston and the “Unknown Heirs of H. M Ralston” in favor of defendant in error, J. N. McCasland, which judgment was based on service by publication as provided by Articles 2039 and 2040 of the Revised Statutes of 1925. The judgment was one awarding to defendant in error title to minerals in certain lands and removing cloud…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wiseman v. CottinghamTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hunsinger v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Dennis v. McCaslandCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API