Legal Opinion

Robbins v. Dueber Watch-Case Manuf'g Co.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio

Decided December 2, 1895No. 4,935PublishedCited by 3 opinions

This was a suit in equity by Royal E. Robbins and Thomas M. Avery against the Dueber Watch-Case Manufacturing Company, John C. Dueber, its president, and Winthrop A. Moore, its secretary and treasurer, for alleged infringement of a patent.

1Opinion of the Court

RICKS, District Judge.

This is a suit for an injunction restraining. the defendants from infringing a patent issued to .Caleb K. Colby on the 23d of October, 1883 (being patent No. 287,001), for an improvement in watch pendants. The prayer of the bill *187Is also for an account of profits, and damages for the defendants’ infringement, from February 13, 1891, to the present time. The defense is — First, that the patent is invalid; second, that the claim is not infringed. The defendants seem to rely entirely upon the prior patents to sustain the defense of invalidity, and in support of the defense…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stebler v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  2. Wilkins Shoe-Button Fastener Co. v. WebbU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1898
  3. American Delinter Co. v. American Machinery & Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API