Legal Opinion

Baggett v. Alto Corp.

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided November 15, 1978No. CA78-H-1056-SPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

HANCOCK, District Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this action in the Circuit Court for the Tenth Judicial Circuit of Alabama to recover for injuries allegedly sustained while she was using a bakery slicing machine located on her employer’s premises. Asserting that the machine was imminently dangerous and unsafe, plaintiff named Alto Corporation as a defendant, in essence charging it with negligently manufacturing the machine and negligently failing to warn plaintiff that the machine lacked proper safety devices. Plaintiff also named Lanham Machinery Company, Inc. as a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Glen Earl Grigg v. Southern Pacific Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Herrera v. Exxon Corp.: Exxon Co., U. S. A.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
  4. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Safeway Steel Scaffolds Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coker v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Albert Pecherski v. General Motors Corp. And Jane DoeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  3. Denney v. SerioSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
  4. Feller v. National EnquirerDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1983
  5. Rowe v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API