In Re Lincoln's Estate
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.
Houston Lincoln contested probate of the will of his deceased father, Peter Lincoln. The proponents of the will demurred to the contestant’s evidence and the trial court sustained the demurrer. The contestant appeals, contending that his evidence showed that the will was obtained by undue influence' and fráud of Sarah Lincoln, testator’s widow, and also that it showed lack of testamentary capacity.
Upon the part of proponents, O. H. Pres-son testified that he had represented testator as attorney for approximately three years prior to the execution of the will; that dur ing that time he had…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of CarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Mantz v. GillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- McClure v. KerchnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Brock v. KeiferSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Canfield v. CanfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Moore v. GloverSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
- Sporn v. HerndonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Amos v. FishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- In Re Estate of NewkirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Toombs v. MatthesenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.