Legal Opinion

Clark v. Humble Oil & Refining Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1933No. 4228PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, Justice

(after stating the case as above).

The pertinent point for determination is that of whether or not the peremptory instruction to the jury was warranted, directing a verdict in favor of the defendants. The appellant insists that the verdict should have been directed in her favor, or, if not, the evidence adduced presented an issue of fact, which, if determined by the jury in her favor, would entitle her to recover. The appel-lees contend otherwise that the court did not err in giving a peremptory instruction in favor of them, for the evidence conclusively established their right to the same. It…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mondragon v. MondragonTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Texas & Pacific Coal & Oil Co. v. KirtleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
  3. Breitling v. ChesterTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Van Deventer v. Gulf Production Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Montgomery v. HornbergerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. ClarkTexas Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API