Legal Opinion
Sturm Ruger & Co., Inc. v. Herman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 13, 2001No. CIV.A.100CV01026(ESH)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HUVELLE, District Judge.
Before the Court are defendants’ Motion To Dismiss or, Alternatively, for Summary Judgment, and plaintiffs Cross Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is attacking the legality of the Data Collection Initiative that defendants initiated in order to gather information regarding the rate of workplace injuries and illnesses, and the average number of employees and total hours worked. In response defendants have moved to dismiss on the grounds that this Court concludes that it lacks jurisdiction, and therefore, the complaint will be dismissed with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Martin v. Occupational Safety & Health Review CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. ReichSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Northeast Erectors Ass'n of the BTEA v. Secretary of Labor, Occupational Safety & Health AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sturm Ruger Co Inc v. Chao, ElaineCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- National Mining Ass'n v. ChaoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Eastern Bridge v. Elaine ChaoDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2002